Inspired by Roland Martin’s recent op-ed piece about moving Election Day to a Saturday, The Point has started a campaign to make the day a holiday.
Check it out and show your support here
-Filed in Ideas
The “meetup” phenomenon has been a big one since it became one of the perceived cornerstones of the Howard Dean revolution in 2003-4. Four years later, Meetup.com still exists as a big way for many organizers to find volunteers to gather around a cause. For those who organize there, the site is considered to be an astounding and invaluable organizational tool. We’ve talked with eight social and political organizers, each of whom come from varying philosophies and locations. Here, they discuss the work they do on the site, some of the hurdles they face, and how they make their interactions on Meetup work towards furthering the perpetuation of the causes that they represent.
This piece, the first in a three part series about Meetup and those who organize there, focuses on outcomes of efforts towards group organization through the site, growth of groups over time, and a look at what participants feel as though they’re unable to accomplish there.
Who shows up?
Several years ago, a Hip Hop show promoter explained to me that he found that normally one in ten people that are invited to a show actually attend. Even more specifically, one in three people who tell you that they’re definitely going to attend can be expected to show up. Similarly, among Meetup groups, there appears to be a consistent surefire ballpark number of participants per event. Of the organizers surveyed, the most consistent percentage of members in a group that show up to meetings is between 5 and 10 percent. Of the number of members that shows up to meetings overall, Dexter Jones of the Tampa Bay Black Professionals explains that somewhere around a third of all of their members have been to at least one meeting.
Maintaining and increasing numbers
As for what the organizers do to make their outcomes better, responses vary. Donna Orlando of the San Diego Libertarians admits that she does very little herself. Delegation of responsibilities and tasks, she stresses, is most important. “The most useful thing I’ve done is to enroll really good assistant organizers, who represent various segments of the membership within a group. That way, there’s almost always someone organizing an event in the reasonably near future that will appeal to the members.”
Other suggestions for keeping attendance counts high ranged from simply “challenging people to get off their asses” to being consistent. Dexter Jones says that by having a meeting every two weeks at the same location, time, and night, average participation has increased by 500%
Stressing the importance of comprehensive engagement, Brett Mandel of Philadelphia Tax Reform says that while his group reaches out with some regularity, “We’re less about leading horses to water than engaging those who come out.”
Collin, whose last name has been withheld, an organizer for Miami Critical Mass, attributes his higher turnout (approximately 15%) to reaching across the board of potential organizational tools - The group prints and distributes fliers around town, utilizes Facebook and MySpace, and he has also mentioned being a member of The Point.
What’s missing?
As for things that users are unable to accomplish with the use of Meetup, some organizers, like Donna Orlando, are thoroughly satisfied with the service and find it to be complete. In agreement, Dexter Jones says that he feels as though he still hasn’t fully leveraged the numerous options made available on the site for promoting his group. Timothy Tipton, however, of the North Denver Medical Marijuana Discussion Group, feels somewhat let down by the slow moderation time on message boards. “They are slow to respond when inappropriate and unprofessional messages, advertisements, and spam. This is especially disheartening when we all know that this is paid service.”
Collin adds that the site is rigid and the layout is odd, though he has no suggestions to change it. He adds, “I wish there was a way to get more input from members. People are not always willing to rate rides, or share their goals or ideas, I wish meetup had ways of getting members get more involved.”
In conclusion
As appears to be the case with community organizing anywhere on or off line, on Meetup, an organizer can expect a return/response from a small fraction of those engaged on the surface. Consistency and building personal relationships with volunteers and participants is an important element in maintaining numbers and increasing participation. Delegation of contact and outreach is also extremely important with regard to maintaining these relationships. Further, engaging those who show up in a comprehensive way is important for encouraging recurring participation. The organizers surveyed appear to be happy with the service for the most part, with exceptions regarding comment moderation and some limitations to free exchanges.
For tomorrow: What happens when a crazy person shows up to your Meetup? Find out here.
-Filed in Uncategorized
Several nights ago I dropped in on Portland [Maine] Green Drinks. The event, familiar to many environmentally interested/friendly folks in several US major cities, is a fascinating networking phenomenon that brings together great elements of the old and the new school of organization. It is organized by a dude named Elliot who reported having recently moved to Portland from the West Coast. While the gathering has been happening under the official banner of “Green Drinks” for several months now, it has until recently been going on locally under the watch of a Maine-based sustainable building company for a few nears. Elliot’s emergence, however, has been responsible for growing the gathering to above 100 folks (up from 20) per meeting.
The reason Elliot has found so much success, it seems, is due both to his tenacity and his making available free beer (provided by Peak Organic - the former collective meeting met at bars where beers cost some cash). Every month the event is cosponsored by a local business that helps to provide space and food and in exchange gets noticed by a slew of sustainability-interested folks. Information about Green Drinks is spread through word of mouth, locally designed posters and various forms of internet outreach. People are brought together to drink beers, network, and discuss their interest, passion for and career in sustainable living.
The meeting was exciting in its positive melding of online communication technologies with the “old school” face-to-face networking (that some of the organizers we’ve talked to have claimed is the only way to go). The yoga studio (and creative tech company) that sponsored last week’s happening was full of people exchanging. While it may been largely organized online,the sharing that occurred in a person-to-person way was refreshing to experience after having based so many organizational efforts solely online. I am excited to bring and present a campaign to talk about with each person I meet the next time that I attend.
-Filed in Uncategorized
We spoke with Jenny Gillespie a short while back about her successful campaign on The Point to put together an album with the help of donations from her fans. Their funds helped to raise the money to record and she has since created this follow-up campaign to help her finish (mix and master) the project.
-Filed in Uncategorized
Last fall, I underwent a common but painful procedure – trying to cancel my cell phone contract. I had recently moved and was getting poor reception, but my phone company of five years wouldn’t let me go unless I paid a $200 termination penalty. Ultimately I decided to put up with the poor service and keep my $200, but only after losing several times that amount in time and happiness.
A simple idea occurred to me: if everyone has this problem, why not organize an overwhelming number of people to stop paying their bills until the phone company changes its policy? If you had enough people, the phone company would be forced to concede for their own survival. This idea may have once been naive, but the way the Internet has evolved — communities of like-minded people gathering on social networks, repositories of collective intelligence on wikis — it now seems to be a natural adaptation of collective action to the Web.
I casually mentioned this idea to Eric Lefkofsky, an entrepreneur and former employer. A few days later, Eric had convinced me to drop out of school and turn my idea into a company.
That was the beginning of The Point. As we analyzed the idea further, we realized we had stumbled onto a model that was capable of far more than settling petty consumer quibbles. We discovered that the same basic technique — withholding action until a “tipping point” is reached where the group’s combined action ensures success –solves a fundamental problem of getting people to do things together. We want to know that enough people are involved that our effort won’t be a waste of time.
Today we introduce The Point. We’ve taken our best stab at creating an environment for group action that leverages the intrinsic benefits of the Web, and we think we’ve done a pretty good job. We have lots to learn, and await your feedback so we can develop The Point in a direction that meets your needs.
We are thrilled to launch and can’t wait to hear what you think.
-Filed in Uncategorized